Up To 70% Of People On Ketamine Therapy End Their Depression
You Could Be One of Them
Ketamine therapy gives you up to a 70% chance of remission?
This isn’t some number plucked out of thin air to give false hope. It’s a careful estimate drawn from real-world studies—replicated over and over again—across clinics, research trials, and patient follow-ups.
No, it’s not a guarantee. But if you’ve been living under the weight of depression, you deserve to know that your odds of remission with ketamine therapy–ENDING YOUR DEPRESSION–are incredibly good.
I’m going to show you why a 70% remission rate isn’t just possible—it’s a reasonable expectation.
This is a long article so skip to any section you please:
Individual Studies Don’t Tell the Whole Story
I don’t rely on individual studies to make my case, even though plenty exist that might seem to prove my point. For instance, one study on IV ketamine reported a 79% remission rate after a nine-month follow-up.
Another study on Spravato (the esketamine nasal spray) showed a remission rate of up to 64% after twelve months. If I wanted to dazzle you, I could stop there. But that would be a lie of omission.
The Danger of Cherry-Picking Studies to Prove a Point
Because here’s the problem: leaning on individual studies is a dangerous game. It means cherry-picking—intentionally or not—the studies that say what you want them to say while conveniently ignoring the ones that don’t.
Yes, I could cite that 64% remission figure for Spravato, but there are plenty of other studies showing far lower remission rates, some barely above placebo. Why don’t I showcase those?
And as for that glowing 79% IV ketamine figure? It came from a single study, with just 56 people.
Holding up isolated studies as proof isn’t just sloppy—it’s reckless. You are distorting reality when you pretend one or two studies speak for an entire field of research. Science doesn’t move forward because of one dramatic study. It moves forward when we step back, gather every piece of evidence, and weigh them as a whole—including the ones that don’t say what we wish they did.
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Are the Only Numbers That Matter
That’s why the only numbers you’ll ever see me use come from systematic reviews and meta-analyses–because they keep us from getting fooled by outliers or one-off flukes. They tell us what’s real across studies, across patients, and across outcomes—not just what happened in a tiny group of 56 people or in one study that happened to get unusually positive results.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses gather all the relevant research that meets clear, published standards and weigh the quality and consistency of that evidence, so we know how strong—or weak—the case really is. If you want to understand what’s actually happening in the real world—not just in the best-case scenario—systematic reviews and meta-analyses are the only way to get there.
You decide to try a new supplement that promises to boost energy. One article swears it works wonders. Another claims it’s useless. A third warns it might even be harmful. Who do you believe?
This is the problem with relying on individual studies. One says a treatment is a breakthrough, another says it does nothing, and a third suggests it could be risky. If you only look at one, you could end up with the wrong idea. But a systematic review or meta-analysis pulls together all the research on a topic, filters out the weak studies, and finds the real pattern. Instead of getting lost in conflicting results, you get a clearer, more reliable answer.
It’s like checking online reviews before buying a product. If one person raves about it, that’s interesting but not conclusive. If hundreds of people agree it’s great, you can trust it’s probably worth it.
Meta-analyses do the same thing. They don’t let one small study make a treatment look better than it is. Instead, they combine results from many studies to reveal the truth. A single trial might claim something works miracles, but if ten larger studies show it barely helps, a meta-analysis cuts through the noise.
By looking at all the best available evidence, systematic reviews and meta-analyses keep us from being misled by small studies, cherry-picked results, or flawed research. They are the most reliable way to understand what actually works—and what doesn’t.
Why a 70% Remission Rate for Ketamine Is a Scientifically Supported Estimate
Every number you’re about to see comes from a deep dive I did into the research—work that took me nearly a month to complete. I went through every systematic review and meta-analysis on ketamine published between 2017 and 2024—twenty in total. Not cherry-picked studies, not isolated findings—the full body of high-level research. So as you read on, know that every percentage and figure comes from that foundation.
Houston, We Have A Problem
The first thing you have to understand is that there’s a huge discrepancy in the way IV ketamine and Spravato, the esketamine nasal spray approved by the FDA, have been studied. The nasal spray has been consistently studied over a period of 6 to 12 months of treatment, with patients getting 8, 16, even 24 doses.
But IV ketamine studies usually stop after just one or two infusions given over a few days. That’s like judging two cars in a race where one is given a full tank of gas and a clear road, and the other is sent out with half a gallon and told to stop after the first mile.
In other words, we know what the longer term/full protocol remission rates are for the nasal spray, but we have no idea what it is for IV or injection ketamine.
The central problem we’re facing is this: How do we estimate IV ketamine’s true long-term remission rate when almost every study stops after just one or two doses?
The answer is by carefully examining four critical facts drawn from these twenty reviews—and then using those facts to build a statistically grounded projection of what IV ketamine is likely to achieve when given as a full treatment course.
1. Esketamine’s Real-World Remission Rate Tells Us What’s Possible When People Stick With It.
Across 20 of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses I analyzed, the remission rates for esketamine (Spravato) land between 32% and 58%. But there’s something crucial hidden inside those numbers: they reflect what happens when people stick with treatment—at least eight doses, often sixteen, sometimes twenty-four, over up to 12 months of care.
In other words, these are not “quick fix” numbers. They show what happens when patients keep going with the nasal spray long enough to give it a real shot. And up to 58% of them walk away in remission—no longer qualifying as depressed.
2. IV Ketamine’s Remission Rate Tells Us What’s Possible After Just One or Two Infusions
Now here’s where things get shocking—and where most people (even some doctors) get confused.
Those same 20 systematic reviews show IV ketamine’s remission rates ranging from 27% to 43%. But almost every single one of those studies stops after only 1 or 2 infusions—over the course of just a few days.
Let’s pause for a moment and take this in because these numbers are breathtaking.
Ending depression after 1 or 2 infusions? It leaves most scientists in awe.
When was the last time you heard of popping one or two Prozacs and having depression disappear?
When was the last time you heard of having one or two therapy sessions and walking away in remission?
NEVER.
Yet up to 43% of people walk away in remission after just one or two IV ketamine treatments. Now, to be fair we don’t know how long the remission lasts (studies hint it can last from a few day to a few months) so don’t go thinking that you can do one or two infusions and walk away cured.
Still, those numbers are nothing less than astonishing.
Now again, because studies stop at 1 or 2 infusions, we never see what happens if people keep going, like they do with the esketamine nasal spray. If that many people recover after just one or two tastes of treatment, imagine what happens if they actually get a full course.
3. Studies Show IV Ketamine Isn’t Just Fast—It’s Much More Powerful Than The Esketamine Nasal Spray.
To be clear, there are no head-to-head studies comparing IV ketamine directly to the esketamine nasal spray (although Yale is starting one). But both drugs have been tested in placebo-controlled studies — meaning each was compared to a carefully designed fake treatment, like a saline infusion or an inactive nasal spray, to see how much better the real drug performed.
And when you look at those placebo-controlled studies side by side, IV ketamine has been shown to be 2.5 to 5 times more effective than the nasal spray. That’s not a gap, it’s a canyon.
This difference in potency is a critical part of how we estimated ketamine’s true, longer term remission rate.
4. Studies Show That Therapy Can Increase SSRI Outcomes By 25%. Meaning, It Should Do The Same For Ketamine.
For decades, studies have shown that combining antidepressants with therapy makes people 25% more likely to get better. That’s well established.
So if therapy improves outcomes for SSRIs, why would ketamine be any different?
Although the research on combining ketamine with therapy is still growing, the early signals are clear: therapy may help people make the most of ketamine’s effects, locking in changes and making recovery deeper and longer-lasting.
If ketamine alone can push remission rates as high as we think, therapy might be what carries people across the finish line—and keeps them there.
A Conservative Statistical Projection of Ketamine’s Long-Term Remission Rates
So what would happen if we took these four points — the real-world remission rate for esketamine when people complete treatment, the stunning remission rate of IV ketamine after just one or two infusions, the massive difference in effectiveness between IV ketamine and esketamine in placebo-controlled studies, and the fact that therapy has been shown to boost SSRI outcomes by 25% — and used them to build a statistical analysis to project ketamine’s true long-term remission rates?
That’s exactly what I did. I worked with a statistician who looked at all these numbers and developed a conservative estimate based on the best available science.
The Result?
68% remission for IV ketamine alone, and 72% when combined with therapy.
So when I say up to 70%, I’m not rounding up wildly—I’m splitting the difference, choosing the cautious middle of a very real range.
You can see the full model he used to arrive at these numbers by clicking the link below.
What Exactly Does Remission Mean?
Remission* means depression is gone—not just better, but fully lifted. You no longer meet the criteria for clinical depression. It’s the difference between functioning and thriving, between getting through the day and actually enjoying life again. It means your mood, energy, and sense of self return to a healthy baseline, free from the constant weight of depression.
Now, just because it’s gone doesn’t mean it won’t come back. Depression can be episodic, meaning it might return under certain conditions—just like someone with asthma can go symptom-free for years but still need treatment if triggers arise.
When I first reached remission, I wanted to jump up and down and yell, “I’m cured! I’m cured!” But remission isn’t a cure—it’s more like a truce in a long battle. A cure would mean the war is over, the enemy defeated, and the threat gone forever. Remission, on the other hand, is when the fighting stops, the skies clear, and you get to rebuild your life—but you know the enemy could return someday.
* The American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Task Force on Response and Remission in Major Depressive Disorder recommends that remission be ascribed after 3 consecutive weeks during which minimal symptom status is maintained.

I thought it wasn’t working–until it did.
Ketamine is supposed to work fast, offering significant relief often in less than a day. But that couldn’t have been further from my experience.
Maybe it was because I used Spravato (the esketamine nasal spray), which studies suggest isn’t as effective–or as fast– as IV ketamine infusion therapy. Maybe it was something else. But for me, relief didn’t come in a lightning bolt. It didn’t even come in a week. It took almost a month before I felt anything resembling improvement.
When psychiatrists talk about “significant relief” or the technical term–response rates– they mean a 50% reduction in depressive symptoms. By week two? I was nowhere close. Week three? Still not there. The idea that I’d feel better after four hours or a day? Laughable.
Yet, at six weeks, my depression was gone. Completely.
There was never a dramatic turning point. There was no moment where the weight lifted, no instant where I “knew” I was better. It was slow. Almost sneaky. One day, I picked up the phone when it rang instead of letting it go to voicemail. Another day, I actually texted friends back instead of ignoring them. Drip, drip, drip.
And then, before I fully understood what had happened—my depression was over.
HOW CLINICIANS MEASURE REMISSION
Most depression scales do not have a formal category labeled “remission.” Instead, remission is often inferred based on specific score thresholds that indicate minimal or no depressive symptoms. Here are some of the more common scales and how they informally categorize the notion of remission:
-
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D): A clinician-administered questionnaire evaluating 17 to 21 symptoms, such as mood, insomnia, and energy levels. A score below 7 is generally considered remission.
-
- Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS): This scale zeros in on core depression symptoms like sadness and concentration. A score of 10 or less often signals remission.
-
- Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): A self-reported tool where you rate how you’ve been feeling. A score of (0-13) is considered remission.

My scores improved before my life did.
During my intake, I scored a 48—smack in the middle of Beck’s severe depression category. I was in rough shape, taking pills to work, pills to sleep, and alcohol to cope.
For weeks, nothing seemed to change. I didn’t feel dramatically better. No sudden breakthroughs. No moment of clarity. Just the same grind of exhaustion and numbness.
Then, almost a month in, my scores started dropping. And two things happened.
First, I was shocked—because it wasn’t like I felt great. I wasn’t walking around thinking, Wow, I’m really improving. But the numbers didn’t lie. My depression was loosening its grip, even if I wasn’t fully aware of it yet.
Now, how is it possible that my score improved, but I didn’t feel any better? That felt like a betrayal—like being told I was winning a race I could swear I was still losing.
The truth is, depression doesn’t lift all at once. It unravels in pieces, healing different systems at different speeds. Those questionnaires were picking up something real—my sleep was getting a little more regular, I was moving a bit more, my concentration was sharpening—but the part of my brain responsible for feeling better was still playing catch-up.
It was like watching the storm clouds retreat in the distance but still standing in the rain. I was improving before I could recognize it. That’s the cruel trick of depression: it dulls not just your joy but your ability to perceive progress. Recovery was happening on paper before it happened in my heart.
At the time, it felt like a contradiction. Now, I see it for what it was: the first signs that something inside me was shifting, even if I wasn’t ready to believe it yet.
Second, I panicked—because I thought my insurance company would see the lower scores and cut me off. I’d been through this before with physical therapy: show too much improvement, and suddenly, you’re on your own—even if you’re not fully healed.
So, I did something I’m not proud of: I lied on the Beck Inventory. I marked my symptoms worse than they really were, trying to protect myself from having my insurance cut off.
When I finally confessed this to my psychiatrist, she laughed—not unkindly, but in a way that said, I get it, but you’ve got this backwards. She explained that the real danger wasn’t in my scores going down—it was in them not going down enough. If I didn’t show at least a 50% reduction in symptoms, my insurance wouldn’t see the treatment as effective, and that’s when they’d cut me off. See what insurance covers here.
By the end of six weeks, my Beck score had dropped to a 3 or 4. The Beck Inventory doesn’t have an official category called “remission,” but again, a score between 0 and 13 is generally considered to indicate remission.
“Michael, your scores on the depression assessment tests are, well…” Dr. Giles, my psychiatrist, hesitated for barely a second before blurting it out with a quick, almost cautious smile: “You are technically in remission.”
The words landed with a weight I hadn’t anticipated, not because they surprised me–I could feel the intensity of the color seeping into my life–but because hearing it from someone in a white coat, someone with the authority to measure the intangible, made it real. It wasn’t just a feeling or a fragile hope anymore. It was an official verdict.
I burst into tears. I could see Dr. Giles’ brow furrowed with concern, as if she thought I’d misheard her. I laughed, wiping my face, and said, “No, I’m not upset. It’s… the relief of knowing I wasn’t imagining how much better my life has gotten.”
What Remission Really Looks Like
In remission, it’s not enough to say, “I feel better.” Clinicians look for a substantial reduction (70-90%) or complete disappearance of symptoms. Key areas they assess include:
- Emotional Resilience: Can you experience stress, disappointment, or sadness without slipping back into depression? Or do small setbacks still hit like a freight train?
- Pleasure and Interest: Do things that once felt dull or meaningless now bring genuine interest or enjoyment?
- Mood: Are you consistently free from feelings of sadness, hopelessness, or emptiness?
- Energy and Motivation: Can you get out of bed and engage in daily activities without feeling drained?
- Functionality: Are you reconnecting with life—work, relationships, and hobbies?
One of the first signs of remission isn’t necessarily joy or excitement, but mental quiet. The relentless noise of self-doubt, guilt, and exhaustion fades, not with a bang, but with an absence. You don’t wake up one day thrilled to be alive—you just notice that existing isn’t unbearable.
There’s also, as I mentioned earlier, an odd tension between knowing you’ve improved and actually feeling better. You might notice yourself talking more in conversations, responding to texts, making plans—but without a single moment where you feel a dramatic shift.

Remission tiptoed in when I wasn’t looking.
Scales and checklists are helpful, but the real test of remission is how you actually feel. Long before my psychiatrist or the Beck scores pronounced me in remission, I knew I was getting better because my life started to change. The awful feelings that once controlled me were waning, and slowly I stopped trying to drown them in pills or alcohol.
I’ll never forget the moment I recognized real progress. I was in the ketamine clinic, and I caught my reflection in the mirror. At first, I didn’t recognize myself. Normally, I walked in looking like a wreck: unshowered, unshaven, dressed in whatever was closest to the bed. But that day? I was clean-shaven, freshly showered, wearing clothes that actually fit me. I’d even woken up early—early!—to work out before my session.
It wasn’t something I planned. I didn’t wake up and decide to put my life together that day. It just happened. That’s the thing about remission—it sneaks up on you. There’s no big “TA-DAH!” moment. One day, you look in the mirror, and you see someone you almost forgot existed.
How Noticing Old Habits Keeps Me in Remission
Staying in remission means catching yourself before old habits pull you back into depression. For me, one big red flag is cutting off contact with family and friends—letting calls go to voicemail and ignoring texts. That was always one of the first things I did when depression hit hard.
Now, when I catch myself slipping into that pattern, I know exactly what’s happening and where it leads—and I act before it takes hold. Sometimes it’s sheer willpower, picking up the phone and calling or texting back. Other times, I stop and think about why I’m starting to isolate and face it head-on. And if I need extra help, I don’t hesitate to go back to my therapist. It’s about stopping the spiral before it starts.
Staying in remission is also about creating the kind of life that keeps depression from finding a way back in. I prioritize sleep like it’s medicine, stick to a routine that includes exercise, and make time for things that genuinely bring me joy, even on busy days.
Man, I’m making myself sound like some self-help guru who’s nailed life, like I’ve got everything figured out and my days end with birds singing me to sleep. It ain’t true. I struggle but I don’t see my struggle as all that different from what anyone else deals with. People without depression have to work to keep their life on track, too. The only difference is I know what happens if I let things slide, so I try to stay on top of it. Not perfectly, not always gracefully, but enough to keep moving forward.
CITATIONS
These citations represent a collection of recent peer-reviewed studies investigating the efficacy of ketamine and esketamine in treating depression, particularly treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
The research spans from 2015 to 2022, providing a comprehensive overview of the latest findings in this rapidly evolving field. These studies examine remission rates, response rates, safety profiles, and durability of effects for ketamine-based treatments. They include randomized controlled trials, double-blind placebo-controlled studies, and systematic reviews, offering a range of high-quality evidence on the topic.
Researchers from various institutions worldwide contributed to these studies, which were published in reputable journals such as Molecular Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry, and JAMA Psychiatry. This body of work represents the cutting edge of research into ketamine as a novel treatment for depression, particularly for patients who have not responded to traditional antidepressant therapies.
Fava M, Freeman MP, Flynn M, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of intravenous ketamine as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(7):1592-1603. doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0256-5
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-018-0256-5
Phillips JL, Norris S, Talbot J, et al. Single, Repeated, and Maintenance Ketamine Infusions for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176(5):401-409. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070834
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31166571/
Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(9):893-903. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1189
Zheng W, Cai DB, Xiang YQ, et al. Adjunctive intranasal esketamine for major depressive disorder: A systematic review of randomized double-blind controlled-placebo studies. J Affect Disord. 2020;265:63-70. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.002
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31957693/
Zhan Y, Zhang B, Zhou Y, et al. A preliminary study of anti-suicidal efficacy of repeated ketamine infusions in depression with suicidal ideation. J Affect Disord. 2019;251:205-212. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.071
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30927581/
Shiroma PR, Thuras P, Wels J, et al. A randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled study of efficacy, safety, and durability of repeated vs single subanesthetic ketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10(1):206. doi:10.1038/s41398-020-00897-0
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-020-00897-0
Ionescu DF, Bentley KH, Eikermann M, et al. Repeat-dose ketamine augmentation for treatment-resistant depression with chronic suicidal ideation: A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2019;243:516-524. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.037
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30286416/
Fedgchin M, Trivedi M, Daly EJ, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22(10):616-630. doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyz039
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31290965/
Canuso CM, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(7):620-630. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060720
https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060720